At this very moment you know just enough to be dangerous. Interchange plus pricing is not automatically the fix for your problem of high processing fees. I highly suggest (and I know my previous employer would agree) that you keep reading.
The Flawed Definition of Interchange-Plus
We have several articles here at CardFellow that delve into the inner-workings of interchange-plus, interchange-plus rates and interchange-plus versus tiered pricing. I’ll leave you to check those out later so I don’t re-cover trodden ground here. I’m going to take a bit of a different approach for this article. I’ll provide the generally accepted definition of interchange-plus below, and then I’m going to proceed to tell you why this definition is, in many ways, flawed. Interchange-plus is a credit card processing pricing model whereby a processor passes the costs of interchange and assessments to a business separate from its markup. This definition is adequate if credit card processing companies followed the rules. But as you and I know, that’s often not the case. As with anything, the devil is in the details. The reason this definition is flawed is that it says nothing about the cost of interchange or assessments being passed to the business at the pricing set by the card brands. The definition is too broad. You may know enough to ask a processor for a quote based on interchange-plus pricing, but do you really know what it looks like if you get it? Would you be able spot a hidden volume markup at interchange over volume, or a tenth of a penny over on assessments? No, probably not. That’s why it’s way easier and more effective for you to use CardFellow’s free service to secure competitive processing once and for all – in five minutes. But if you insist on going it alone, you should read the following points very carefully. They outline just a few of the ways that processors sneak charges into “interchange-plus” pricing.Concealing a Markup on Interchange
With interchange-plus, a processor should pass the costs of interchange and assessments to a business separate from its markup. That’s what the definition says. But there’s nothing that says a processor can’t tack a little extra onto the actual cost of interchange, which we see more often than you’d think. I once helped a business that signed up here at CardFellow. The business received several instant quotes that are quite literally as competitive as credit card processing gets, but they didn’t select a winner. So I reached out to learn why. What I found is that they thought they were already paying “interchange-plus” 0.02%. They thought that although they were close, none of the quotes offered through CardFellow were less than their current pricing. Quotes offered through CardFellow are significantly more competitive than a business’s current processor 99% of the time, so I asked this company to send a statement to me for review. I wanted to see this 0.02% markup for myself.The Statement
Sure enough, I received a statement showing a flat 0.02% charge on volume, which is highlighted below.
However, upon further examination, I found that a hidden markup of another 0.30% was being added to interchange. This business thought they’re paying 0.02% when in fact the total markup is actually 0.32%. As I’ll show you, 0.30% is being concealed in interchange.
Below is a line taken from this business’s statement that list the processor’s charge for a Visa interchange category called “Rewards 1.” Visa’s posted rate and fee for this category at the time was 1.65% plus $0.10. As you can see from the statement, there was $3996.17 of volume and 73 transactions in this category this month. Let’s calculate the charge for this category.
1.65% of $3996.17 yields a fee of $65.94, and 73 transactions at $0.10 is another $7.30. Combined, the total fee is $73.24. But the processor charged $85.23. The difference between $85.23 and $73.24 is $11.99, and $11.99 is 0.30% of $3996.17.
